Real-World Performance Study
Cohort 2: Multi-Source Performance Characterization
Real-World Performance Study under HEL-RWP-FRAMEWORK-v1.0. Twenty cases evaluated under a three-layer performance model with multi-source ground truth construction. Methodological characterization of all divergences. Not a binary pass/fail study; foundational scientific evidence at the current organizational stage.
Public scientific report
Cite this study
The archived report, persistent DOI and full metadata record are available through OSF.
Suggested citation
Mitev V. Cohort 2: Multi-Source Performance Characterization. Helena Bioinformatics public scientific report, 1.0, August 2026. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/RTBK8.Study specification
Layer 1 - Analytical performance
Single non-detection attributed to upstream sequencing pipeline failure via 7-step audit trail; Folklore platform integrity verified via 21:21 input-to-database record correspondence; Folklore attribution CLEARED
Layer 2 - Classification performance
Identical ACMG class with the peer reference comparator. Anchored variously in ClinVar 2-3 star, ClinGen Hearing Loss VCEP v1.0, KDIGO 2025 ADPKD guideline, or independent multi-criterion convergence.
Methodologically characterized: 2 validated design behavior (computational-only LP guard and AR carrier guard operating per design), 3 feature-gap accumulation at LP/VUS boundary (PP3 tool divergence, PM1 coverage, PP2 implementation), 1 manual-criteria-dependent inherent automation limitation
No opposite-direction classifications observed
Upstream variant calling pipeline failure (verified non-Folklore attribution)
Amendola 2016 (66%), Harrison 2017 (72-76%), Bergquist 2025 (70-75%) inter-laboratory FULL concordance benchmarks
Layer 3 - Clinical workflow performance
Target P/LP variants placed in Tier 1 of phenotype matching output
at least 50% match score
Variant mentioned, interpretation correct, overall quality good
Seven consecutive PASS at cohort closure (Cases 14-20). Improvement trajectory documented across the cohort.
Trigger-configuration validation of conservative-guard architecture across diverse real-world clinical scenarios
Six-category methodological-disposition taxonomy
Cohort 2 assigns each observed concordance pattern to a methodological-disposition category. The taxonomy records why results differ and informs future cohort design without reducing the study to a binary pass/fail result.
Tier 1 ground-truth concordance
13 componentsFolklore and the peer comparator both reach the same classification, anchored in VCEP curation, ClinVar 2-star or higher, or established clinical practice guidelines. Multiple ACMG criteria converge on the same class.
Disposition: No action. System operates correctly. Multiple validation milestones documented.
Validated design behavior
2 componentsFolklore classification reflects a documented classifier guard operating per ClinGen-aligned conservative design principles. Disagreement with the peer comparator does not reflect platform error; the guard is the explicit intended output for genotype-context-aware classification.
Disposition: No remediation. Update Change Request registry status to validated with cohort cases as evidence anchor.
Feature-gap accumulation at LP/VUS boundary
3 componentsMultiple documented feature gaps in Folklore automated classification scope collectively prevent reaching the LP combining-rule threshold. Three identified gaps: PP3 computational predictor tool divergence, PM1 critical-domain coverage scope, and PP2 not yet implemented in the automated classifier. Each gap is independently characterized and roadmap-tracked. Distinct from defect: the gaps are documented limitations, not errors.
Disposition: Roadmap-tracked. PM1 domain coverage expansion in flight (HELIX-CR-2026-082, deployed April 2026 with UniProt residue-level evidence integration). PP2 implementation roadmap formalization. PP3 tool-choice divergence: no classifier change recommended (defensible methodological choice per ClinGen SVI).
Manual-criteria-dependent inherent automation limitation
1 componentClassification depends primarily on manual-curation evidence (case-control / case-series literature, family cosegregation, individual ClinVar submitter evaluation) that is not available from VCF input. Distinct from feature gap: not a classifier roadmap item, but an inherent scope limitation of automated VCF-only classification.
Disposition: Long-term automation roadmap items only: literature mining for PS4 case-control automation, external trio data ingestion for PP1 segregation, gene-aware PP2 thresholds for small genes. Not classifier defect remediation.
Input data layer upstream pipeline failure
1 case (NOT EVALUABLE)Target variants absent from input VCF due to upstream sequencing or variant calling pipeline. Folklore platform integrity verified via 21:21 input-to-database record correspondence at correct genomic target coordinates. Failure is upstream, not Folklore.
Disposition: No Folklore remediation required (attribution cleared). Upstream pipeline investigation pending sequencing facility action.